Ethiopia Institute of Technology- Mekelle
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.mu.edu.et/handle/123456789/58
Browse
1 results
Search Results
Item COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF LQR, PID, FUZZYPSO AND PSO-PID CONTROLLERS ON QUARTER CAR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEM(Mekelle University, 2025-04-05) KOKEB GEBREMEDHINThe purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of various control strategies for active suspension. MATLAB/SIMULINK software is used for both the controller design and the quarter vehicle model. The control strategies PID, LQR, PSO-PID, and FUZZY-PSO are employed. The suspension travel response and sprung mass acceleration response two critical parameters for ride comfort and road handling are chosen, examined, and compared between the responses of the active suspension system and the passive suspension system in order to assess the effectiveness of the vehicle's suspension system. The two Key Performance Indicators (𝐾𝑃𝐼𝑀𝐴𝑋 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐾𝑃𝐼𝑀𝐴𝑋) are chosen to demonstrate a decrease in peak overshoot and a decrease in oscillation for the parameters chosen for the active and passive suspension system comparison. From this research, in summary, the PSO-PID and FUZZY-PSO controllers that were created exhibit exceptional performance in enhancing ride quality, hence increasing passenger safety and vehicle handling in the presence of two bumpy road disturbances. When it comes to decreasing to sprung mass acceleration and suspension travel, the PSO-tuned fuzzy logic controller performs the best, followed by PSO-PID, LQR, and PID controllers.