College of Business and Economics

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.mu.edu.et/handle/123456789/38

Browse

Filters

20241

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.ABNET SISAY TESHOME

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    DETERMINANTS OF LIVELIHOOD DIVERSIFICATION AND ITS IMPLICATION ON VULNERABILITY OF PASTORAL AND AGROPASTORAL COMMUNITY IN AFAMBO WOREDA OF AFAR REGION, NORTHEASTERN ETHIOPIA
    (Mekelle University, 2024-10-20) ABNET SISAY TESHOME
    Livelihood diversification has been recognized as a tool to cope with economic shocks and reduce vulnerability. This paper focused, identifying the current livelihoods strategy, determinant factors of livelihood diversification, major constraints of livelihood diversification, and the effects of livelihood diversification to reduce vulnerability of pastoral and agro-pastoral household in Afambo Woreda of Afar region. The study was followed the multi-stage sampling procedure with a sample household of 351 of these 139 from pastoral and 212 from agropastoral households. Quantitative and qualitative data types was collected using structured survey questionnaires. Both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics were used for interpretation of the result. The Simpson index of diversity was computed to investigate the degree of livelihood diversification. The findings of the result showed that both pastoral and agro-pastoral households have medium level of livelihood diversification portfolio with a mean value of 0.579 diversity index which covers 55.56 percent. The range of medium level of livelihood diversity were 4 to 6 livelihood options. The maximum level of diversity index was only cover 19.37 per cent of the households which classified a high level of diversified income sources. The major determinate factors of livelihood diversification were households’ level of income, access to training, provision of livelihood support, family size, years of experience in age and exposure to shocks contributed positively significant at 5% level. While, consumption expenditure, distance to market, land size and dependency ratio were negatively significant at 5% level. The majority of households’ livelihood vulnerability ranges highly vulnerable and moderately vulnerable for both pastoral and agro-pastoralist. Major indicators of vulnerability to shocks and stress include a decline of the pasture lands, death of livestock, reduction of water availability, losses of crop production, food insecurity months and outbreaks of human and livestock diseases. To curve the livelihood diversification challenges, the woreda pastoral development office, local lined sector institutions and Non-governmental development actors should support the pastoral and agro-pastoralists with provision training, provision of livelihood support which would enhance livelihood choices in addition to primary livestock production.